See a real report.
These are complete, full-length Veriscore reports — the same deliverable a paid analysis produces — one at each verdict tier. No signup required. Open any of them to scroll the entire report, charts and all. The Legit example is a genuine run on a real creator, published as a dated snapshot; the other three are constructed accounts that demonstrate what each tier looks like.
A clean, authentic creator
A real Veriscore run on Marques Brownlee (@mkbhd), published as a dated snapshot. Engagement is consistent with the subscriber base, the audience looks real, and there are no behavioral red flags.
Real account · analysed 27 July 2026
View full report →Mixed signals worth verifying
A genuine core audience, but inflated reach and uneven engagement. Not fraudulent — but worth a paid test and an Insights request before a larger spend.
Illustrative account · constructed to demonstrate this tier
View full report →Likely purchased views
View counts are wildly out of line with engagement and saves are near zero — a classic purchased-view pattern. Independent verification required before proceeding.
Illustrative account · constructed to demonstrate this tier
View full report →Predominantly fake audience
Engagement is a fraction of what the follower count implies, the follower base is mostly bots, and growth came in purchased bursts. A clear do-not-proceed.
Illustrative account · constructed to demonstrate this tier
View full report →Want to know how these scores are produced? Read the methodology — the signals, weights, and risk tiers behind every verdict.
Run your own — 35 free creditsSamples marked Illustrative use invented handles created to demonstrate a verdict tier; any resemblance to a real account is coincidental. Samples marked Real account are unedited output from a single Veriscore analysis run on the date shown — a point-in-time record, not a live or ongoing assessment. Scores describe the data available on that date and may differ from what the same account would score today.