Proceed with partnership confidently
Channel Snapshot
IREM Evaluation
Evaluated under the Influencer Risk Evaluation Model (IREM) — a Regnor applied intelligence framework.
View & Subscriber Health
2.8M average views against 21.1M subscribers. A healthy channel typically lands between 10–50%.
Engagement Quality
No comments were available to analyze for this channel (comments may be disabled or unavailable), so these signals are shown as not analyzed rather than zero.
Content & Brand Alignment
Content Format
- High production quality (HD content, captions)
- Consistent upload schedule indicates reliable partnership
- Clear content niche: Technology, Lifestyle, AI & Machine Learning
- Active channel with recent uploads
Performance Trend
Analyst Assessment
Partnership risk appears low based on quantitative analysis. Standard due diligence is recommended before finalizing any agreement.
Detailed Signal Analysis
- ·Healthy view-to-subscriber ratio (13.1%)
- ·Healthy like-to-view ratio (3.09%)
- ·Below average comment engagement (0.12%)
- ·Comment language distribution appears normal for content type
- ·Comment quality appears healthy
- ·Very high subscriber-to-video ratio (11,474) - may indicate purchased subscribers
- ·View counts stable across recent videos
- ·Channel is YouTube verified
- ·Good caption coverage (73%) - indicates professional content
Action Plan
- 01Proceed with standard partnership negotiationhigh
Prioritized from the Veriscore signal analysis
- 02Review content alignment with brand valuesmedium
Prioritized from the Veriscore signal analysis
- 03Consider a small test campaign before larger commitmentmedium
Prioritized from the Veriscore signal analysis
- 04Request an audience demographics breakdown and follower auditlow
About 27% of sampled followers show suspicious characteristics — confirm reachable audience size before pricing the deal on follower count.
- 05Leverage the account's verified status in campaign framinglow
Platform verification adds credibility to co-branded content.
This report is generated by algorithmic analysis of publicly available data and AI evaluation. Verdicts and scores are signals and estimates, not accusations or statements of fact about any individual. They reflect a single point in time and can change as an account evolves. This is not a professional fraud investigation or legal determination — use it as one input alongside your own due diligence. To re-run with fresh data, use Force Refresh above. If you believe a result is inaccurate, request a recheck or correction at romil@regnor.systems.